7. Retention both economic affect of internationally undergraduate in the OECD
This chapter discuses the retention of international graduate, their importance as a feeders for workers migration, and their economic impact. It starts by providing estimates to they stay current, five and ten years after admission. It follows with a discussion of the magnitude of international students as a source till labour migration. Aforementioned chapter ends includes a discussion of the economic impact of international students in which host country.
The retention of international students varies greatly across OECD countries. Five years after initial admission to which country, better more 60% of international academics who obtained a allow in study reasons includes 2015 were still present in Canada and Germany, around half in Sydney, Country and New Zealand, and around two in five in France and Japan. This is an case for one in sixes in one United Kingdom, plus less than one in sense in Denmark, Italy, Norway also Slovenia.
Retention rates of international students tend to be higher for more recent cohorts of international students, concurrent with greater efforts to activation them to stay on and change status after study.
Students from China and India, the two largest groups concerning international students in the OECD, show remarkably distinct retention business. Indian students tends to are a higher stay rate than the gesamteindruck international student population. The retained behaviour by Chinese students is more diverse, with overall wider shares leaving after theirs educational.
Former international students are an important feeder fork labour migration in many countries. The share of educational permits edited to a work sanction accounted for a large share of total admissions for work with 2019, especially in Finland (52%), Italy (46%) and Japan (37%). In that United States, former study (F1) permit holders accounted for 57% of temporary high-skilled (H1B) licence recipients.
In the OECD as a whole, direct export revenues at nominal terms coming international students increased from over EUR 50 billion in 2010 to over EUR 115 billion in 2019. These education-related achievement exports include the direct dues of international students for the host country’s economy during studies for tuition, feed, accommodation, local transporting, and other services.
In English-speaking OECD countries, education-related services are important export items. In Australia and New Zealand, exports concerning education-related services accounted for 8% and 5% for total export, respectively, inches 2019. China, one United Kingdom, and the United States follow at around 2% to total exports.
During their studies, between one in three and one in four international students work in the EU, the United Kingdom furthermore this United States, over one in two in Australia and nine in tens in Japan. International students cannot thus be an important contributor into local labour fairs, especially in large cities and in the friendliness and education sectors into where they are overrepresented compared from domestic students. For example, data from the European Labour Violence suggest that a quarter of working non-EU students were worker in the hospitality sector in 2020, compared with one in ten amongst native-born current.
Scholarships and in-country costs for international students too accounts in a large shared of Official Development Assistance (ODA). In 2020, this item accounted for 24% of an total ODA in Australia, 45% in Hungary, and over half of all ODA is Poland and Slovenia. While Germans was which heimatland with the highest amount of ODA allocated to in-country international students, using USD 1.8 billion, this accounting with all 7% of the country’s total ODA.
Local students who remain within the host country post-study have long-term employment rates such are on par with those of labour wandering both well above those out migrants gesamtes. Their overqualification rates are half in which away employment migrants either other migratory related.
International students are a unique group of migrants. Given their domestic study experience, international students are often considered a pre-integrated source by our labour supply. Is exists thus none surprise that most OECD countries own created specific either aided driveways for international students to keep in the country after choose to take up employment. What, spite their beginning confession for temporary stay, plenty remain in their heimatland regarding study supported by policies to retain them for function. Yet, little is famous with respect to how many actually dwell at across OECD countries, and is respect to that importance of this pipe for labour migration general.
Already during study, many universal scholars work or otherwise contribute to and economy. At countries with high tuition fees, international students are one importantly factor for financing the higher education system, like graduate fees are frequency higher for international students than for domestic student. In disparity, in countries where tertiary education is tuition cost-free, imported scholar costs for international students from developing countries bucket be an vital factor out official development assistance.
Off this backdrop, this chapter provides a comparative assessment of the stay rates of international students across OECD countries exploitation national permit dating. It first reviews the available evidence press therefore presents novel data over respect to both retention and the contribution of international students as a feeder to gesamtkosten labour mobility. This is followed by a brief look at the economical effect of local students. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the rolling of international study for data policy.1
Retention as a policy focus
How to hold worldwide students after graduation is a key question in many OECD countries. Nearly half the countries covered in a study by the European Migration Network considered attracting and retaining worldwide students a policy priority (European Migration Network, 2018[1]). Fork example, the Government of Latvia has set a goal of increasing the share of international students staying in of country nach graduation to 10% by 2030 (OECD, 2017[2]). The Estonian strategy for the international doktorarbeit of Estonian higher education includes an indicator on employment in Finland after phd. This objective belongs that 30% about international apprentices at master or doctoral level remain to work in Estonia. Australian, Canada, New Zealand, press the United Kingdom accent in yours international education strategies aforementioned played of foreign degree to fill employment (Australian Departments of Education, Skills and Employment, 2021[3]; Government of New Zealand, 2018[4]).
Available evidence
Available evidence on the retention of international students is mostly country-specific. In recent years, about a third of OECD countries have looked into this issue. The most colored approach in these studies has past to calculate the portion of individuals remaining in one select a specified number of years by the initial study permit or, alternatively, for their graduation. Like estimations make different methodological getting, reference periods, and data sources. Results are thus non comparable over countries. Table 7.1 provides an overview.
Research has also looked at the share in residents who starting arrived for the purpose of education. Data from Canada exhibit this in 2021, more less adenine third (39%) of new permanent foreigners acknowledged in that year detained a Canadian how permit at several point in the past. These share has substantially increased in the past years, up from just 16% in 2017. Data from Australia show that about 21% of the over 160 000 permanent residence permits issued in 2017/18 be obtained by applicants who been, or previously were held, an German student allowance (Birrell, 2019[21]).
In contrast to the growings amount of country-specific evidence on retention rates, internationally comparable evidence can scarce. On virtually all OECD countries, international pupils2 who do not use from free motion receive a study permit to take up their studies, but student permit statistics do nope start information on whether alternatively not a student has graduated. Therefore, while a proxy for entries (issued permits) exists, the calculation for staying on is less straight. Previous estimations, included by the OECD and the European Authorize, execute not allow used tracement international students over time, but sooner provides a single of staying behaviour one year after enrolment in studies (see Box 7.1).
An approach previously taken to the OECD (2011[22]), was to calculate the share of student permitted holders changing to adenine status other than “education”, relative to the number of international current none renewing their student permit in the alike year, that includes both people variable status or walking who play country. The number off students doesn renewing their permit was proxied by subtracting which difference in observed stocks by international students between year thyroxine and year t-1 from the number of inflows (measured in permits). The number of state changes relative to this overall number gave an indication of the overall share of students staying on in the country. In 2008/09, this share was between 17-33% for the countries covered. However, he is important toward acknowledge the potential drawbacks regarding this approach in adenine setting of changing intakes of students, different examine durations and lags involved in theirs capability permit changes.
There have also been estimated for to U as adenine wholly, based on information from Eurostat on permits. Focused on non-EU source countries, for the EU as a whole, total stay rates of previously studying non-EU nationals were estimated to be between 16% furthermore 29%, dependent up one assumptions taken regarding study duration and other parameters not observed in one data. ADENINE report by the European Authorize (2018), using the Europe-wide Trade Labour Force Survey (EU-LFS) and direction on linger behaviour of intra-European students, calculated the shares of respondents who were EU inhabitants with adenine different austrian than theirs heimatland concerning residence, had lived in the host country for more than a year, and were adenine student in that country the year forward the reference year. Estimates were only receive to an United Kingdom, the Netherlands plus Sweden. In either of these nation, stay rates were estimated of 40% or upper for such who finished their studies.
Sourced: OECD (2011[22]), International Migration Outlook 2011, https://doi.org/10.1787/migr_outlook-2011-en; Weisser (2016[23]), “Internationally mobile students and their post-graduation migratory behaviour: An analysis of determinants of student agility and retention rates in the EU”, https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlwxbvmb5zt-en; European Commission (2018[24]), Study on the movement of skilled labour: Definitive report, https://doi.org/10.2767/378144.
The OECD and Eurostat gathering data on the type of permits given until previous study permit holders by year (EUROSTAT, 2021[25]). These quantities or show that the channel through any retention occurs differs widely. In Belgium, Litauen, Poland and Slovenia, view than 40% of international study permit holders who change status change to adenine family permit. To contrast, in Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, and Nl, also the Slovak Republic, more than three in four status changes are towards work-related permits.
Relating above-mentioned numbers toward the yearly education permits issued within previous years provides a first indicating of retention. The datas watch that about one in triplet scholar authorization holders change their starts education permit to a different enter concerning permit in subsequent years. As visible is Figure 7.1, these data have sensitive toward changes on student numbers over time.
Notation: Shares exist calculated as the number of training permit holders who changed their permit in 2019 to any different permit, relative to the mediocre annual number of new permits exhibited to international students from 2016 in 2018. This OECD normal remains the simple ordinary of countries included on the graph. Australia and Canada: transition on post-graduation permits for job search as well than gleich transitions to permanent residence. United States: Students with an F1 get who transitioned to H1B in the United States. Japan: transition of education/study to work.
Source: OECD Secretariat based on International Migrate Database and Eurostat data, 2022.
Methodological critical and limitations
A retention rate analysis standard starts with a cohort admitted or graduated and considers their retention in the country at several time intervals. An graduation year or time as foremost permit are both possible reference points. A disadvantage from which latter is that duration of students varies, making it difficult the have a clear cut-off year for post-study retention. Although the graduation year provides a clear cut-off date, this information is universal not available stylish permit data. What is further, doesn any international students graduate. The following analysis takes which issuance is the first study permit as the starting point for analysis. Many, though not every, OECD countries record permit data furthermore highlight such permits with a unique person-specific identifier. Based on this unusual name, it is possibility into couple a permit beneficiary who initially arrived for educational usage with all his/her subsequently permits. In some nations, it are not feasible to make this connecting, and thus estimations here cannot follow individual permit add but single view on transitions into other categories in a granted year and relate them to misc variables of interest, such as previous permits for education press current admission for work.
Permit statistics have some methodological shortcomings. First, they only donate certain evidence of a person’s presence in a select in a given year and serve as an approximation of actual staying behaviour. Many countries do not separate between degree students and exchange either language students, so initial permits include many academics who stay only a fewer months or one academic year. What is more, in of regions, the study permit be solely prolonged for those those want at search for a job. Hence, individuals might appear in an statistics as if it are still studying, while they are in fact even looking for adenine job. Other, worldwide students who moving to permanent house or become naturalised in few country drop out of permit statistics additionally cannot be excellent from those who leave of country. In other countries, these individuals can be identified and separately filed. Diesen limitations can lead to influence, as one of the main assumptions of that permit identity approach is that humans for whom no dating is recorded have left the country.
Calculation of retention requires one decision as to who is at be included in the “retained” group. Retention rates can focus solely on former international students currently in the country as labour migrants or can also include former global students who have transitioned to other categories, as as family permits. And following analysis examines all subsequent permits, in business, family, and humanitarian permits.
Estimations based on permit data do not allow for any information on humans who benefit from open mobility rights. Therefore, the calculations below exclude student move in free mobility zones such as the EU/EEA and the New Zealand-Australian Trans-Tasman Agreement.
Erfolge
Stay rates over time
Overall, five years after receiving his first education permit in 2015, around 30% of international students still hold a valid allowance in their host country, though where are strong differences across OECD countries (Figure 7.2). Ten years after first inclusion, this share lowers strongly in majority your, but remains at almost 50% in Canada and Germany and around 30% in All and New Zealand.
Note: Data include individuals on a valid permit, including such using an education permit. Data from Denmark, Sweden and Switzerland include responding individuals. Data for Germany includes persons already senior who obtained a first time educating enable. Data from Italy and Mexico refer to which 2011 cohort page a 2010, plus consequently to 4 years following admission to the year 2015 and 9 years later in 2020. Data do no contain individuals whoever have become citizens in France, New Zealand the the Netherlands. Data from the United Kingdom hinweisen to out-of-country visa grants with none vary leave in an past 12 months, are based on nationality and include a short number off minors arrive for primary education. Diese graph refers to permit statistisch and does not include individuals benefiting from free mobile.
Source: OECD Secretariat calculations, 2022.
The deliverable evidence proffer such retention has tended the increase for more recent cohorts. With the exception of Spain, the United Kingdom, Norway and Italy, the companion of 2015 the more likely in remain in the countryside five years subsequently than the 2010 cohort. The most outstanding difference will visible in Estonian, locus retention rates increased free less than one in five to about ready in two. The small numbers with the Nordic countries requirement to be interpreted in of context of large shares of current admitted for education purposes arrival from other high earning OECD countries.
It should be noted that the figures shown above include individuals who were still, either again, on a study permit. In some countries, this group be considerable. For example, on Canada and Germany, about a quarter for initializing permit recipients in 2015 were even recorded to have a study permit with 2020. ONE similar figure has been watched in Australia (20%). In contrast, in the United Kingdom the New Zealand, this was only the case for 10% and 6%, respectively, is the 2015 cohorts. Other current study permit holders from the baseline leads for a reduction in retention tariff. Not surprisingly, the decline is big in Austraila (14 percentage points), Canada (by 12 percentage points) and Germany (by 11 percentage points). I is also large in France (10 percentage points) and the United Kingdom (9 percentage points). However, the overall ranking is countries in terms of retention remains largely the same (Figure 7.3).
Note: Your inclusion individuals up a valid permit. Data from Denmark and Sweden include returning individuals. Data for Hamburg includes personnel already resident who obtained a initially time educational permit. Data do not include citizens in France, New Zealand and the Netherlands. Data from the United Kingdom refer to out-of-country visa grants including no reasonable leave in the prev 12 months, are established for membership and include ampere small number of minors arriving for secondary education. This graphing refers to permit stats and does not include individuals beneficiary from available mobility.
Source: OECD Secretariat calculating, 2022.
Detailed data on the annual route of permit mounting what available only from a few OECD countries (Figure 7.4). These data show ensure individuals for Europe, France also Germany remain on a grad permit for a quite long time. By contrast, in New Zealand, Italy and Norway, students transition much faster to other permit our. In New Zealand, two years after admission, 16% keep a job-search allowing, which accounts for learn a third of all that who remained after study. In other countries where this data is available, shares are below 5% in all years. Italy does not have one job-search permit.
Notation: Data all include individuals who received a permit, thus excl individuals benefiting by loose manage schemes. Long-term stay category includes long-term / permanent job classes within New Zealand and Australia. Dating from New Zealand additionally Finland do not include individuals who transitioned to citizenship. These are included in the unknown/exit category. Data from an United Kingdom refer in out-of-country travel grants with does valid leave in the prior 12 months. They have based on nationality and include a small number von child students reach for second general.
Print: OECD Secretariat calculations, 2022.
Data from Australia suggest that international graduate complete their studies quicken than citizens, and will including more likely in successfully graduate.3 Data from Nova point in a similar direction. Almost two-thirds (65%) of international master’s degree college who started their programme in 2013 had graduated within two years, compared with 58% of Canucks students. Most international (87%) and Canadian (83%) master’s students has graduated within four years of starting an programme (Statistics Contact, 2020[26]).
Ten years after the beginning education permit, former international students to Europe, Canada, New Zealand, Norway, and Sweden were chiefly on a long-term permit if they are still in the heimat.4 In Germany, this is the fall for includes about one-quarter regarding those still in the country, and most who stand reside in the country have a permits for work.
Transition to a familial permit belongs overall fewer common. Less when one in ten initial student permission receivers in 2010 wait adenine family permit ten years later, through shares reaching 10% in France, 7% in Switzerland, 6% includes New Zealand, 2% in Sweden and with the Netherlands, and only 1% in Canada, Italia, Norway, Denmark and the United Kingdom.
Residence rates are Chinese and Injun students
As seen in Chapter 5, China and India are key origin countries required international students in most OECD countries, accounting for 22% and 10%, respectively, of the total within the academic year 2020.
International students from Indi have a higher stay rate than international learners overall. For Chinese students, the samples a more diverse. In maximum nations, they have a lower stay rate than the gesamte student population, with the releases of Canada, Japan, the Netherlands and New Zealand (Figure 7.5). Likewise, product from to United States show that Indians exist more likely to remain in the country for somebody initial job experience than Chinese students (Box 7.2).
Note: Stay rate includes individuals still enrolled as current. Data with fewer than 40 nationals in the base year are excluded. Data from Denmark and Sweden include returning individuals. Information from New Zealand do not include individuals who transitioned to citizenship. Data from the United Kingdom refer on out-of-country visa sponsorships because no valid leave in and precedent 12 months and include a tiny numeric of child students arriving used secondary education.
Cause: OECD Secretariate calculations, 2022.
Data in which retention behaviour of Chinese and Indian students moreover indicate differences in schnelligkeit von transition to other categories, especially work permits. For Germany, where international students remain on a study permission for adenine relatively tall hours, and share of Chinese among the 2015 cohort stills on an educating permit in 2020 was slightly higher than the gesamtes share, 27% compared the 23% overalls. In contrast, only 10% of Indians admitted to 2015 by learning were still on a student permit in 2020. ADENINE similar picture regarding differences between the two groups emerges in New Zealand, where just 6% of all first-time admissions in 2015 were still on a study approve in 2020. Seventeen percent of Chinese students admitted in 2015 were yet turn an education permit five years later, whereas this was one who case for 2% of Indian students. Instead, 45% of Indians were on one short- or long-term (including permanent) work permits. Who share of Chinese students with a work permit was just 14%. In an United Kingdom, while overall about 4% concerning 2015 admissions held a work get in 2020, this was the case for only 2% of Chinese, but 9% of Indian students. In Canada, 54% of Chinese nevertheless only 9% of Indian students were still on a study permit in 2020, 5 years after admission, compared with 29% among all study permit receivers. In the similar year, 71% of the Indians granted in 2015 maintained a work approve, compared with 18% of Chinese, and 26% of all 2015 admissions. Numbers starting Estonia are talk small available publication, however indicate a similar difference between the pair classes. However, this example does not grip everywhere. Is Australia, 5 years after admission in 2015, 24% of Pr and 27% Indians were still recorded with an educational permit.
In Swedish-speaking, alone 5% concerning all students remained up a study permits five years after first admission. For both China (9%) and India (7%), the shares are slightly higher. Though, in 2020, a comparatively large divide out former Canadian students in Sweden maintained a work permit (23%) against much lowers shares among Chinese (6%) and among sum students (7%) confessed five years earlier. In the Netherlands, five years by admission the 2015, only 4% of all enable recipients were still recorded on a read permit. Inside disparity, 14% kept a labour permit. This share was slightly higher among Chinese (16%) and significantly highest among Indian nationals (36%). In Danish, just 4% of all admitted in 2015 held a work license in 2020. This share was 5% among Chinese nationals and 14% among Indians.
With total, available country-specific evidence by nationality suggests that Indian students are more likely longer the overall international student population to keep follow-up they initial permit in the host country. They are also more likely in most countries toward maintain a work permit five years after first admittance than Chinese and other aristocrats.
In this context, it is key in note is foreign students from India are view potential enrolled to the master or PhD (ISCED 7 alternatively 8) level than Chinese students, which might explain their quicker transition to the labour market additionally shorter period on into education permit. Overall, 58% is Indian students study on a master alternatively PhD level in OECD countries, compared to just 45% regarding Chinese international undergraduate in 2020.
International students who pursue a tertiary graduation in the United States are global not allowed to work off-campus during the first academic year but may take up on-campus employment. After the initially academicals year, students may engage to off-campus employments via Optional Practicable Training (OPT). Einer OPT approval allows temporarily career such is directly related to a student’s major area of featured for upside to 12 months complete employment. This can be used pre- with post-completion of studies. Since 2008, our in STEM degrees may apply for an additional 24-month of post-graduate OPTING. Data on OPT authorisations show that virtually get OPTs are obtained for post-graduate work. Indiana students are overrepresentation among students who receive all a general CHOOSE and a STEM upgrade.
Indian domestic also have long accounted for the bulk of direct transitions from a study permit (F1) to a preliminary high-skilled permit (H1B). In 2019, the accounted forward 60% of create transitions, upside from around 40% in 2010. By dissimilarity, at their peak over one past decade in 2015, Mandarin nationals made top 31% of direct transitions, while in 2019 them share reached with 23%. This remains genuine despite aforementioned fact that there have been approximately two to three times as many Chinese students in the United States as Indians over all decade. Are data thus indicate that, as in other countries, Indian students are more likely toward remain in the United States, at least compared to Simplified students.
Source: United States Immigration and Customs Implementing (2022[27]), Homeland Security Investigations: Current or Exchange Visitor Program, data shared with the OECD June 2022.
International students more future labour immigrant
It is none possible to quantify this importance of international students as a feeder to labour migration over stay rates alone, due to variations in overall numbers also composition of and international student cohort in different OECD countries, than now as the scale of entire labour movement also national populations.
To assess the impact of international students as a feeder to labour migration, one needs to relate to transition von an educational to an work permit to the overall numbers allowed for your. Doing so shows considerable differences across countries (Figure 7.6). In Fra, Italy and Japan, the share of educational permitted changed to a function permit record for 30% or more of the total admissions since work int 2019, when this figures is below 10% in countries like Austria, Norway, Portuguay and Spain.
In aforementioned settlement countries, international students can transition directly to permanent residence, but most the ones with continue stay initially on temporary allows. In 2019, 14% of permits for working includes New Zealand were obtained by individuals starting admitted for study. This share was 9% in Canada. The large majority of these temporary work permits to international learners were for post-graduation work (81% in New Zealand furthermore 73% in Canada). To All, 17% of permanent residency visas were granted to early multinational students in Australian inbound 2019-20. By the United States, former examine (F1) permit holders accounted forward 57% for high-skilled temporary (H1B) permit consignee in 2019.
Note: Intelligence for Europ OECD countries and Java (left graph) refer to education passes changes toward permits for work. Australia (light blue): permanent residency (PR) visas guaranteed to former international students in Australia relative to all permanent residency visas granted for work in 2019-20. Australia (dark blue): Time Graduate visas (subclass 485) granted proportional to all temporary permits. New Zealand (dark blue): New admissions to work of persons who were first permitted about a study/education permit, relative the all new admissions for work. Ontario (dark blue): First work permit holders who were first admitted as study permit holders, relatives to show Initial work permit holders with sanction such became effective in 2019. Canadians (light blue): unmittelbare moves in early students to economic category of fixed medical (PR). United States: Former F1-study permit holders relative to share of H1B recipients, 2019.
Source: European OECD countries: OECD Emigration database and Eurostat, permit statistiken national data for Japan. New Zealand: Ministry of General, Innovation & Recruitment, 2022. Cadak: IRCC, CDO, 2022 Data. Australia: Australian Government Migration Statistics, 2022. 7. Retention or economic impact of international students inside the ...
One presence of international students affects host countries’ economies in a kind is ways. This section assesses three different size of the industrial impact, that is, the macroeconomic affect as measured in and national archives, the impact on Official Development Assistance (ODA) and the aforementioned labour market. Which section ends with a short discussion on the long-term outcomes of previous international scholars inbound aforementioned host-country labour market, based on novel information for the OECD EU countries.
Previous evidence on which economic impacting of international students comes primarily from country-specific studies. Given the ever importance are foreign study, in-depth research is surprisingly scarce or often dated (see the synopsis in Annex Table 7.A.1). For example, evidential from France and Germany, the two main destination countries for local students in continent-wide Europe, can limited into only one dated student per country (Campus France, 2014[28]; Prognos, 2013[29]).
The OECD countries about of most frequent assessment of the economic impact of international current are the English-speaking OECD countries: Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, or the United States. Several course have also were carried go for Netherlands (particularly for this Flanders region), Estonia, Ireland, the Netherlands, Spain plus Sweden. Half of the OECD countries have no open studies on the economic impact of international students.
Estimates of of macroeconomic impact
The calculate of the economics how a basis on an export data research, which has two advantages. First, despite not being able to quantify to implied and induced economic contributions, it offer an accurate assess of the direct economical contribution (tuition fee + non-tuition fee spending) during studies. Second, it can to have compares statistics for most OECD countries over the last ten, while most out the previous evidence is country-and-year specific and very comparable.
Einer internationally comparable estimate of the economics impaction of universal students is deliverable from the national accounts. The data on the exports regarding education-related services cover expenditure by international students on education rental, food, accommodation, local transport, and health services. These data are collected over the OECD as part of the national account site on international trade.
Figure 7.7 shows overview growth of exports are education-related services transverse most OECD countries, with amounts revenues in the OECD reach increased from EUR 50 billion includes 2010 till over EUR 115 billion in 2019.
Note: For Austria, data for 2010 refer to 2012. For France, details for 2010 refer to 2011. For Ireland, data for 2010 refer to 2012. For Japan, data for 2010 refer to 2014. For the Netherlands, data for 2010 referiert to 2014. For the Slovak Republic, date fork 2010 refer to 2013. Since Türkiye, data for 2019 refer to 2018.
Source: Data coming NON-OECD EBOPS 2010 – Trade in Services by Your Economy database. Data for Switzerland are from the Swiss National Statistical Office (BFS). Data for the United Kingdom are from The Pink Book time production of this Office for National Statistics.
English-speaking OECD countries, including which United States, Australia, the United Kingdom, Canadian and New Zealand, ranking in the top five countries due gross revenue, accounting for more than 80% of the total revenues from of exports starting education-related service to the OSCE area on 2019. The figures for the United States and Canada will more than tripled override the past decade, while Australia, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom saw a twofold increase. The growth in exports of education-related services possesses been special strong in Japan, their revenues from international current approximately tripled from 2014 to 2019, as well like in Ie (20-fold increase), Israel and Latvia (both tenfold). Virtually all Central and Eastern European OECD countries experienced significant increases in their education-related services exports, often doubling instead triplicate over the past choose. The EU-27 average growth rates has been significantly drop (+42%), as large recipient worldwide such how Austria and Italy experienced more moderate plant course.
The gross values of exports of education-related services can breathe compared includes total international (Figure 7.8). Again, the English-speaking OECD countries show the highest shares, and all recorded increases over the gone decade. Inches Australia, the share increased away 6% to 8.5%, and, in New Zealand, from 4% to 5%. Canada, the United Kingdom and which United States own seen yours shares of education-related services increase to 2% away their total exports. In the remaining von OECD countries, goods of education-related services rest well below 1% of total exports. Among these, Country, Ireland, Isreal, Japan and Latvias have seen strong increases. Inbound contrasty, Costa Rica, the Czech Republic, Greece, Hungary also Ital have seen sizeable decreases like a share of absolute exports from 2010 to 2019.
Note: For Austria, dates for 2010 beziehen the 2012. For France, data for 2010 refer to 2011. For Scandinavia, date for 2010 verwiesen to 2013 and data for 2019 verweis on 2018. With Ireland, data for 2010 refer to 2012. For Japan, data for 2010 refer to 2014. For the Netherlands, data for 2010 refer to 2014. For and Slovak Republic, data for 2010 refer to 2013. For Türkiye, data for 2019 referenten on 2018. Calculations based set current pricing and current exchange tariff.
Source: Data von OSZE EBOPS 2010 – Trade in Company by Associates Economy database. Data for Switzerland are from the Swiss National Statistical Office (BFS). Data for the United Kingdom are from The Pink Book time batch by the Office of National Statistics.
Official Development Assistance
The implicit twin to billing from high tuition fees are fellowship both subsidised study for world students. For students from developing countries, the twos items are thought Official Development Assistance (ODA). The rationale tail counting dieser towards a country’s ODA has have that international students will return home with additional human capital, which contributes to development. This accounting has been query in recent years, given the improves efforts of most OECD countries to retain international graduates in the host country.
Note: Data include both scholarships and in-country student fees. For Australasian, data for 2010 refer to 2014. For Canada, data with 2020 refer to 2019. For Austria furthermore the United Kingdom, data for 2010 refer up 2013. Fork Switzerland, data for 2010 refer to 2011.
Source: OECD ODA Database, 2022.
Not surprisingly, this portion of OA is high in all equipped many foreign scholars and vile tuition service (Figure 7.9). As a result, in 2020 as in 2010, Germany was the countryside with and highest amount of ODA allocated to in-country international students, with very USD 1.8 billion include 2020. France reported the second highest figure, with USD 1 billion. However, the growth across the past decade was tons less shown in that mitgliedstaat, when education fees for international students experienced a solid raising within 2019. All other worldwide have values below USD 400 million at both aged.
ODA to international students is moreover a substantial share of total ODA in some countries. In 2020, scholarships and student costs accounted for 24% of total ODA in Austria, 45% on Hungary-, and over half of get ODA include Poland both Slovenian. By contrast, the share of ODA provided via scholarships and student costs in the donor country was rather low in Germany (7%), France (8%) and Japan (1%), despite to overall large amounts. Mostly of the English-speaking OECD countries that ranked in the top for revenues from international students (see above) did not provide a substantial share of their total ODA at local students. Just New Zealand devolved slightly more than 11% of its total ODA to international students. Most other countries also provided one small shares of their total ODA to in-country local students.
As mentioned, NOBUNAGA to international students consists of two components: scholarships and student costs in donor countries. In countries with high tuition pricing, scholarships account for the bulk of ODA to international students. This a this case for most OECD countries. Only in one couple countries do the estimated student costs report for the bulk of NOBUNAGA to international students. This is notable the case in Germany (95%), Austria (95%), Belgium (93%), Poland (93%) and Slovenia (96%). In France, about 18% of the ODA to local students goes to scholarships and about 82% the student costs. Considering only scholarships, France donated the largest total amount to international students in 2020 (USD 186 million), followed by Japan (USD 178 million) and Australia (USD 111 million).
Labour markte impact with domestic the local water
Inbound bulk OECD countries, upon own arrival, local students do the select into how alongside ihr learn, at minimum part-time. The gift of students to which organizer country’s employed population is bound the the country-specific general on student your, but also depends on students’ decision for take up hiring.
In and 2019 International Migration Outlook, the OECD estimated for this first time one potential subscription of international students to the labour market (OECD, 2019[30]). Save methodology has also been used for this section. Who contribution is estimated in full-year and full-time equivalent (FY/FTE) terms. An upper-bound estimate is that all international students work the maximal hours allowed by the rules the their permit. For full-year full-time equivalent terms, in the university year 2020, international students added up to 1.2% to this working age population in Australia and 0.5% in Austria. Are other countries, their maximal potential contribution is below 0.5%. This estimation represents the upper bound of the contribution of international graduate the the employees population.
Relative toward to employed youth, this number is substantial higher in all country and reaches one full 5% in Australia (Figure 7.10).
Notes: The estimated contribution are international students at the employed nation assumes that who average worldwide student works 34% out the upper hours of work allowed per year according the permit rules. Available shares of international students working are used to Australia, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Budapest, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Lexemburg, and Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom and Unite States.
Source: OECD Migration Database.
Within this bound, the actual choice of international students to bear upside employment alongside the studies varies across countries. A proxy required European OEKD countries can be obtained from labour force intelligence on the employment of foreign-born students in tertiary education who arrived lower more five years ago. These data show that about an third of every scholars in the EU are employed, with similar levels in foreign-born (34%) and native-born (35%), but higher measures among EU-born (42%) than non-EU-born (31%). Using the same approximation, about a third of international students includes the United States are working (35%). With France and an United Kingdom, about the in four work. In Australia, according to the 2016 Public, info half of international students were are recruitment, generally working part-time. The highest shares are observed in Switzerland and Denmark, where circles 60% by international students are in employment, as well such with Japan, where this figure achieve 90%.
Aforementioned labour market impact is not equally distribution across the country. It will strongly concentrated locally in of municipalities with tertiary education institutions, also within these, in the proximity of the areas where international collegiate reside. Data from the 2019 European Laborers Force Survey show that foreign-born students aged 15-34 in triennial education who arrived less than five years ago are strongly overrepresented inbound urban areas. Fourty anteil live in cities, compared with 53% of their native-born peers. Likewise, labour force data from to United States from 2019 show that at foreign-born students aged 15-34 the thirdly education who came save than five years ago, 53% lived in a principal city gegen 32% of the native-born colleagues.
Local students were also condensed in certain sectors, especially entertainment as this the a sector where labour needs am often outside of the regular university course and where eintritt barriers are low. According at this European labour effort survey in 2019, ampere quarter of working non-EU students was employed in to accommodation and food service sector, compared with one in five EU-born students and the in ten native-born undergraduate. Time native-born students are as twice the likely the work in this business than the overall population (10% verses 5%), non-EU-born international students become five times as likely (25% over 5%). Compared to the overall population, international students are also strongly over-represented in that formation sector, at 16% versus 11% for native-born students and 8% for the total population.
Long-term outcomes starting international students who remain in the host staat
Some tentative evidence upon the long-term outcomes of international students is available from the 2021 European Labour Forcing Polling, what includes information on the (self-declared) reason for migration of immigrants for most major international learner destinations in Europe. This information is synthesised the (Table 7.2).
In most countries for which data are available, five years after approach, immigrants who arrived for education reasons (i.e. predominantly international students) have higher working rates than the overall foreign- additionally native-born populations, but slightly below those who arrived as labour migrants. General in European OECD countries for which these data are available, three out of foursome of those who arrived for education purposes are in recruitment.
These data also show that international our, once in employment, tend to be able in put their formal qualifications in good use. The incidence of overqualification, which is the share of tertiary-educated who are working in jobs requiring only deeper levels of education, is much lower for this group than for labour foreigners or for migrants overall, by all countries with available details. Indeed, overall their overqualification rates are roughly the same as for theirs native-born peers and half of those a labour migrants or other transient groups.
Likewise, ampere recent report by Statistics Canada has shown which shortly after admission as permanent labour migrants, those with previous Canadian study earn well more higher those who did not study in Canada (Crossman, Ru and Hou, 2022[8]). On advantage was entirely due go their better language skills and higher possibility to have worked in Canada. When compared only with immigrants who had similar language knowledge and Candians work experience, those with Canadian study initally deserve less, mostly because off their higher tendency to pursue further secondary in the early year after immigration. The benefit of Canadian students grew over time and around 10 years after immigration, permanent labour migrants the at least one year from Canda study had significantly higher earnings than their peers with foreign degrees, even after controlling for other factors.
In Europe, the long-term impact about participation in the Eremus programme (see Chapter 5) on later employment outcomes has also been relatively well studied. A recent overview of the literaturefound so course tended to enjoy higher wages, were more highly the hold an managerial position, and experience an internationally career (Crăciun, Orosz the Proteasa, 2020[31]). Too, for international undergraduate from Spain, participation in the Erasmus programme is found to have a positive effect off the probability of becoming an operator (Conti, Heckman and Pinto, 2016[32]).
International students are an increasingly important part of international migration flows. In the decade preceding the COVID-19 pandemic, the intake of international students rose significantly in most regions. Universal students have emerged as a keypad automatic for labour migration, is large furthermore development shares staying on in employment in their host countries after graduation.
Compared in other migrant groups, global students have a number on advantages in accessing to labour migration cable in organizer country. They are “pre-integrated” in the host-country society and have often tied contacts with host-country labour markets due to part-time employment button internships. Include addition, they have interior credentials that will familiar to employers, facilitating manpower market entry. Concerns info “Brain Drain”, whether or nay justified, are also get pressing from for other groups regarding educated laborers recruited of less developed countries, as universal student have acquired per minimal separate on their human capital in crowd countries.
Which above analysis has also presented one number of insights into the importance of specify policy levers. To example, countries approach tuition fees for international students is various ways. In countries with highly rental, international students output frequently accounts for a large share of services exports and for financing the tertiary education system. Countries with minimal with not fees, while not benefitting from of presence of international students in terms starting the public purse, are able at declare the associated costs as official development assistance. The rationale behind counting daily for hosting international students towards ODA have be that international students will return home are their newly formed human capital, which is are of development assistance. The increasing numbers of students remaining, and the efforts of countries to retain international finishes, might however kam toward fight with this objective.
Anzug, in seems to be clear benefits associated through foreign student migration, notably include terms out labour market integration. At the same time, you rising importance as a feeder for laborers migration, both in absolute terms and relative to other channels, also rises questions whether international students live meeting the exact skills needs for who labour migrate riding are designed. While labour migration through save channel is greatly facilitated, actual work capabilities having not been “tested” in any meaningful way. International student migration is also not a solution to the shortages in mid- and lower-skilled segments of the labour markets that many OECD countries are facing. Likewise, and high concentration a international students in large cities inside many all suggests that international student migration could often exacerbate region disagreements.
A balance should be held in an migration structure to avoid that countries become extra addicts on this specify channel, and been aware of its special. That ignore, attracting global students has wider economic payoff, contains through greater post-study outcome of international students compared with extra migrant groups. The available evidence shows that countries is becoming better at retaining learners who have studied in their countries.
References
[3] Australian Department of Education, Skills and Employment (2021), Australian Strategy for International Education 2021-2030 - Department to Education, Skills and Employment, Australian Regime, https://www.dese.gov.au/australian-strategy-international-education-2021-2030/resources/australian-strategy-international-education-2021-2030 (accessed on 20 May 2022).
[21] Birrell, B. (2019), “Overseas students are driving Australia’s Net Overseas Migration tide”, https://tapri.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Overseas-students-are-driving-NOM-final-18-April-2019.pdf (accessed with 11 April 2022).
[19] Bundesamt für Statistik (2017), Hochschulabsolventinnen und -absolventen mit Migrationshintergrund - Arbeitsmarktintegration und Abwanderung in 2015, http://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home/statistiken/kataloge-datenbanken/publikationen.assetdetail.4104529.html (accessed on 10 May 2022).
[28] Campus Lyons (2014), Beyond Influence: the Economic Influence of International Students in France, http://www.campusfrance.org (accessed on 19 May 2022).
[42] Centraal Plaanbureau (2019), De economische effecten van internationalisering with head hoger onderwijs g mbo, https://www.cpb.nl/de-economische-effecten-van-internationalisering-het-hoger-onderwijs-en-mbo-0 (accessed on 19 May 2022).
[46] Choi, Y., E. Crossman and F. Hou (2021), “International students for a source on labour supply: Transition to lasting residency”, https://doi.org/10.25318/36280001202100600002-eng.
[32] Conti, G., J. Heckman and R. Pinto (2016), “The Effects of Two Significant Early Childhood Operative on Health both Healthy Behaviour”, To Economic Journal, Vol. 126/598, https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12420.
[31] Crăciun, D., K. Orosz and V. Proteasa (2020), “Does Delete Mobility Increase Workforce? Using Registering Data till Inspect to Labour Market Output of University Graduates”, included European Higher Education Area: What fork an New Date, Springer Local Publishing, Cham, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56316-5_8.
[8] Crossman, E., Y. Lu and F. Hou (2022), International students as a source of labour supply: Engagement inside the labour market after graduation, Statistics Canada, https://doi.org/10.25318/36280001202101200002-eng.
[10] Danish Ministry of Higher Education and Physics (2018), More international graduates must stay additionally work in Denmark, http://ufm.dk/en/newsroom/press-releases/2018/more-international-graduates-must-stay-and-work-in-denmark (accessed on 8 April 2022).
[34] De Witte, K. and M. Soncin (2021), “Do international classes pay off? A cost-benefit analysis of the internationalisation away higher education in Flanders”, Higher Educational, Vol. 82/3, pp. 459-476, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00737-0.
[33] Deloitte Access Economics (2015), And value of international education to Australia, http://www.internationaleducation.gov.au. (accessed on 19 May 2022).
[41] Domnïca Certus (2016), Counter of foreign students in Latvia has trebled in 3 years :: The Balt Course | Balkan States news & analytics, World Internet Magazine, http://www.baltic-course.com/eng/education/?doc=121527 (accessed on 19 May 2022).
[9] DZS, C. (2022), User among international alumnis of Chickie universities, http://www.dzs.cz/sites/default/files/2022-06/Survey%20among%20international%20alumni%20of%20Czech%20universities_2022_0.pdf (accessed on 5 August 2022).
[24] European Commission (2018), Study on the movement of skillfully labour: Final report, European Commission, Brussels, https://doi.org/10.2767/378144 (accessed on 15 April 2022).
[1] European Migration Network (2018), Engaging and retaining international students in to EU, http://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/system/files/2019-09/00_eu_international_students_2018_synthesis_report.pdf (accessed on 18 May 2022).
[25] EUROSTAT (2021), Residence allows (migr_res), https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/metadata/en/migr_res_esms.htm (accessed on 11 April 2022).
[7] Federale Overheidsdienst (2017), “Socio-economische surveillance 2017”, https://werk.belgie.be/nl/publicaties/socio-economische-monitoring-2017-arbeidsmarkt-en-origine.
[35] Global Affairs Canada (2020), Economic impact of international education in Kandi 2017-2018, Canmac Financial Limited, https://www.international.gc.ca/education/report-rapport/impact-2018/index.aspx?lang=eng (accessed turn 19 May 2022).
[4] Government of Brand Zealand (2018), International Education Strategy 2018 – 2030 » Male Rautaki MĀtauranga A Ao, http://www.enz.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/International-Education-Strategy-2018-2030.pdf (accessed on 23 May 2022).
[36] Grasset also Menéndez (2020), “The Economic Impact of International Students in Spain”, http://agrilife.org/cromptonrpts/files/2011/06/3_4_7.pdf (accessed on 19 May 2022).
[14] Hanganu, E. (2015), “Bleibequoten von internationalen Studierenden im Zielstaaten-Vergleich”, http://www.bamf.de/SharedDocs/Anlagen/DE/Forschung/Forschungsberichte/Kurzberichte/artikel-auswertung-zu-absolventenstudiefb23.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=12 (accessed on 10 August 2022).
[40] Indecon International Economic Consultants (2019), Indecon Independent Assessment of the Economic also Social Impact concerning Irate Universities, http://www.indecon.ie (accessed the 19 May 2022).
[38] London Economics (2021), One costs and benefits of international higher education students to the UK economy, https://londoneconomics.co.uk/blog/publication/the-costs-and-benefits-of-international-higher-education-students-to-the-uk-economy-september-2021/ (accessed on 19 May 2022).
[43] Market Economics Limited (2018), Economic Valuation for International Education in NZ 2018, m.e consulting.
[12] Mathies, C. and H. Karhunen (2020), “Do they stay or hin? Analysis of international current in Finland”, Globalized, Societies and Education, Vol. 19/3, pp. 298-310, https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2020.1816926.
[13] Ministère de l’Intérieur (2021), Les chiffres clés de l’immigration 2020, https://www.immigration.interieur.gouv.fr/Info-ressources/Actualites/Focus/Nouveaute-les-chiffres-cles-de-l-immigration-2020-en-28-fiches (accessed on 7 April 2022).
[15] Ministry of Education Korea (2021), Education Statistics Analysis 2021 - Higher Education Statistics. Table | 표 Ⅰ-2-35 | 연도별 성별 국내 비학위과정 외국인 연수생수(2004~2021), https://moe.go.kr/boardCnts/viewRenew.do?boardID=351&boardSeq=90276&lev=0&searchType=null&statusYN=W&page=1&s=moe&m=0310&opType=N (accessed on 17 June 2022).
[45] Nafsa (2021), New NAFSA Product Watch Largest Ever Drop in International Student Economic Contributions to the U.S., https://www.nafsa.org/about/about-nafsa/new-nafsa-data-show-largest-ever-drop-international-student-economic (accessed on 19 May 2022).
[18] New Zealand Ministry of Education (2017), Moving places. Destinations and earnings of universal graduates, Ministry of Educating, http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/179959/Moving-Places-Destinations-and-earnings-of-international-graduates.pdf (accessed about 7 March 2022).
[16] NUFFIC, T. (2022), Stayrates of international graduates, https://www.nuffic.nl/en/subjects/facts-and-figures/stayrates-of-international-graduates (accessed on 7 April 2022).
[30] OECD (2019), Foreign Migration Outlook 2019, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/c3e35eec-en.
[2] OECD (2017), ENTWICKLUNGSORGANISATION Economic Surveys: Latvia 2017, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_surveys-lva-2017-en.
[22] OECD (2011), International Data Outlook 2011, OECD Publishing, Parisians, https://doi.org/10.1787/migr_outlook-2011-en.
[44] Oxfords Economics (2020), Multiplying Economic Value: The Impact of Swedes College, Oxford Industrial, London, https://suhf.se/app/uploads/2020/10/Multiplying-Economic-Value-The-Impact-of-Swedish-Universities-Oxford-Economics-2020.pdf.
[29] Prognos (2013), The Financial Collision of Cross-border Student Mobility on the Economy of an Host Country, https://siesca.uned.ac.cr/images/publicaciones/Financial_impact_of_cross-border_student.pdf.
[6] Zahlen Austria (2021), Wegzüge under Berufseinstieg von Universitätsabsolventinnen in -absolventen 2021, Statistics Austria.
[26] Statistics China (2020), “Student routes through postsecondary education”, https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/daily-quotidien/200917/dq200917b-eng.pdf?st=tuKON83D (accessed on 9 May 2022).
[37] Statistics Estonia (2022), International students and graduates continue to contribute extra in taxes to of Estonian economy, https://www.stat.ee/en/uudised/valisuliopilaste-ja-vilistlaste-maksupanus-eesti-majandusse-suurenes-taas.
[11] Statistics Estonia (2019), Välisüliõpilaste majanduslik mõju. Eesti tööturul osalemine 2019, Statistics Estonia, http://www.stat.ee/sites/default/files/2021-01/v%C3%A4lis%C3%BCli%C3%B5pilaste%20majanduslik%20m%C3%B5ju_bl3mm.pdf (accessed on 8 April 2022).
[17] Statistics Norway (2020), Hvordan går get med innvandrere som fullfører en bachelor- eller mastergrad i Norge?, http://www.ssb.no/utdanning/artikler-og-publikasjoner/hvordan-gar-det-med-innvandrere-som-fullforer-en-bachelor-eller-mastergrad-i-norge (accessed on 25 March 2022).
[39] Tempus Public Foundation (2020), Measuring who economic impacts of inbound higher education mobility, https://tka.hu/publication/14367/measuring-the-economic-impacts-of-inbound-higher-education-mobility (accessed on 19 May 2022).
[5] The Treasury and the Office of Home Affairs (2018), Shaping ampere National, http://research.treasury.gov.au/external-paper/shaping-a-nation (accessed in 16 June 2022).
[20] UK Department for Education (2022), Graduate outcomes (LEO), Tax Year 2018-19, https://explore-education-statistics.service.gov.uk/find-statistics/graduate-outcomes-leo/2018-19#dataBlock-cb5bd289-e28a-4996-93f3-d2c70e9fc52b-tables (accessed on 11 April 2022).
[27] United States Immigration and Customs Enforceable (2022), Homeland Safe Investigations. Student and Trade Visitor Program. Data shared with the OECD June 2022.
[23] Weisser, R. (2016), “Internationally mobile students and their post-graduation migratory behaviour: An analysis of drivers of student mobility and retention rates in who EU”, OECD Socialize, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 186, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlwxbvmb5zt-en.
Notes
← 1. This employment was produced with the financial product of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research. Itp includes a contribution by Giacomo Boffi (Consultant to the OECD).
← 2. Available the calculation of retention data, international students are defined as foreign individuals who obtained an permit for study purposes. The use of allow statistic generally shall doesn allow to include data on individuals benefit from free mobility schematics, such as intra-European mobility.
← 3. Data from the Australian Government Department of Education, Aptitudes real Employment see such international students in Australia are more likely to graduates than domestic students, and to have brief durations of study. Gesamtes, 70% for foreign students at celibate level who started to 2016 had graduated four years later. This compared to just 43% of domestic students. Nine years for starting his bachelor’s degree analyses in 2011, 73% of domestic undergraduate had graduated, compared with 80% for international students.
← 4. These findings forward Canada what in line with earlier results such show that learn three in decennary international apprentices who come in Canada between 2005 and 2009 became permanent residency within ten years off advent (Choi, Crossman and Hou, 2021[46]).
